Inflation Dropped to 2.7%. So Why Are Interest Rates Not Falling?

Yan Zhu
Co-Founder & Chief Data Officer

The ABS published the latest inflation number last week. 2.7 per cent. The target band is 2 to 3 per cent. So inflation is back inside the target zone for the first time in three years.
Every content creator on the internet immediately declared that rate cuts were imminent. Media outlets ran headlines about relief for mortgage holders. Social media was flooded with predictions about timing and magnitude.
Most of them are wrong. And I am going to show you exactly why, using the actual data the Reserve Bank uses to make its decisions. Not the headline number. The real number.
Headline CPI vs trimmed mean CPI: the distinction nobody explains
Here is the critical distinction that separates people who understand monetary policy from people who read headlines.
The Reserve Bank of Australia does not use headline CPI as its primary inflation gauge. It uses trimmed mean CPI. These are different numbers, and right now, they are telling very different stories 1.
Headline CPI: 2.7 per cent. This is the number you saw on the news. It measures the change in prices across a broad basket of goods and services. The problem is that headline CPI is heavily influenced by volatile items like fuel prices, fresh fruit, and government subsidies. When the government announces a one-off energy rebate, headline CPI drops. But the underlying cost pressures in the economy have not changed at all.
Trimmed mean CPI: 3.9 per cent. This is the number the RBA actually watches. It strips out the most extreme price movements at both ends of the distribution, leaving you with the core inflation rate. At 3.9 per cent, core inflation is still significantly above the 2 to 3 per cent target band 2.
Let me say that plainly. The number that matters is 3.9 per cent. Not 2.7 per cent. The headline number includes temporary distortions that will reverse. The trimmed mean number reflects persistent inflationary pressure that takes time to resolve.
Anyone telling you that rate cuts are coming because headline CPI dropped to 2.7 per cent either does not understand how the RBA makes decisions or does not care about accuracy.
Employment: the other half of the equation
Inflation is only one side of the RBA's dual mandate. The other is full employment.
Australia's unemployment rate sits at 4.1 per cent. By historical standards, that is remarkably low. The labour market remains tight, with employers still struggling to fill positions in hospitality, healthcare, construction, and professional services 3.
Here is where it gets interesting. If you talk to actual people, friends, colleagues, clients, many of them will tell you that finding work feels harder than the data suggests. There is a disconnect between the headline unemployment number and the lived experience.
The explanation is in how unemployment is measured. The ABS counts anyone who worked at least one hour in the reference week as employed. One hour. So a qualified accountant doing three hours of Uber driving on a Saturday is counted as employed. A nurse who was laid off and picked up a single casual shift at a staffing agency is counted as employed.
The headline unemployment rate of 4.1 per cent masks underemployment, the transition to lower-quality jobs, and the growing gap between full-time and casual positions. But from the RBA's perspective, the official unemployment number is what matters for policy decisions. And at 4.1 per cent, the labour market does not require stimulus 4.
A tight labour market means wage growth remains above historical averages. Wage growth feeds into services inflation. Services inflation is the stickiest component of the trimmed mean. This is the cycle that keeps the RBA cautious about cutting rates.
When will rates actually fall?
My personal assessment, based on the current data trajectory: Q2 2021 at the earliest.
For the RBA to cut, it needs to see trimmed mean CPI trending convincingly towards 3 per cent, not just headline CPI sitting inside the band. It also needs to see some softening in the labour market, perhaps unemployment rising to 4.5 per cent or above.
Neither of those conditions is currently met. The economy is in an awkward middle ground where headline inflation looks controlled but underlying pressures remain elevated 5.
I want to contrast this with what you hear from property spruikers. They will tell you that rate cuts are just around the corner, that now is the time to buy before the flood of buyers arrives. This is not analysis. It is sales pressure disguised as economic commentary.
The responsible approach is to model your investment on current rates and treat any future cut as a bonus, not a baseline assumption. If your property's cash flow only works with a 150-basis-point rate cut, you are speculating on monetary policy. That is gambling, not investing.
What this means for property investors right now
In a sustained high-rate environment, the properties that survive and thrive are the ones generating genuine positive cash flow at current rates. Not projected rates. Not hoped-for rates. Current rates.
This is why our investment thesis at PremiumRea is built around rental yield as the primary filter. We target properties that generate 5 to 8 per cent gross yield after light renovation. At those yields, the property covers its mortgage even at current rates. When rates eventually do fall, the cash flow surplus expands. But the property was never dependent on rate cuts to be viable 6.
Contrast that with a typical negatively geared investment in a premium suburb. The yield is 2 to 3 per cent. The investor is losing $15,000 to $25,000 per year after tax benefits. The entire thesis depends on capital growth exceeding the annual cash loss. If rates stay elevated for another eighteen months, the cumulative cash drain can reach $40,000 to $50,000 before any rate relief arrives.
Across our 350-plus transactions, the average gross yield after renovation is 5.8 per cent. That is not an accident. It is a deliberate design choice that immunises our clients against exactly this kind of prolonged rate environment.
The data is not telling you to panic. It is telling you to be precise. Understand the difference between headline and trimmed mean CPI. Understand that the RBA watches employment as closely as inflation. And understand that betting your financial future on the timing of rate cuts is a game you cannot win.
Buy properties that work at today's rates. If rates fall, you win bigger. If rates stay flat, you still win. That is how you build wealth in any rate environment.
References
- [1]Reserve Bank of Australia, 'Statement on Monetary Policy', August 2020. Distinction between headline CPI and trimmed mean CPI.
- [2]ABS, 'Consumer Price Index', Cat. No. 6401.0, Q3 2020. Headline CPI 2.7%, trimmed mean CPI 3.9%.
- [3]ABS, 'Labour Force', Cat. No. 6202.0, August 2020. Unemployment rate 4.1%.
- [4]ABS, 'Underemployment and Hours Worked', 2020. Discussion of measurement methodology and underemployment metrics.
- [5]Westpac Economics, 'Rate Cut Timing Forecast', September 2020. Analysis of conditions required for RBA rate cuts.
- [6]PremiumRea portfolio data. Average gross yield after renovation: 5.8% across 350+ transactions.
- [7]CoreLogic, 'Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis', 2020. Impact of rate changes on property holding costs by price segment.
- [8]RBA, 'Cash Rate Target History', 2020. Historical cash rate movements and forward guidance.
About the author

Yan Zhu
Co-Founder & Chief Data Officer
Former actuary turned property strategist, Yan brings rigorous data analysis and policy expertise to help investors make better decisions.