---
title: "The Apartment Trap: Why So Many Chinese-Australian Investors End Up With Depreciating Assets"
description: "Melbourne apartments lost 2.1% in value over the past decade while houses gained 68%. Real data on why apartments underperform and what Chinese-Australian investors should buy instead."
author: Yan Zhu
date: 2025-10-06
category: Scam / Warning
url: https://premiumrea.com.au/blog/apartments-vs-houses-chinese-investor-trap
tags: ["apartments", "houses", "Melbourne", "Chinese investors", "capital growth", "body corporate", "off-the-plan", "investment warning"]
---

# The Apartment Trap: Why So Many Chinese-Australian Investors End Up With Depreciating Assets

*By Yan Zhu, Co-Founder & Chief Data Officer at PremiumRea — 2025-10-06*

> I keep meeting investors who bought Melbourne apartments five or six years ago and have watched them flatline — or go backwards. The pattern is always the same.

I have to be honest about something, even if it upsets people.

Over the past four years, I've sat across from at least fifty Chinese-Australian families who bought off-the-plan apartments in Melbourne between 2015 and 2020. The conversation is always painful. They paid $550,000 for a two-bedroom apartment in Docklands, Box Hill, or Southbank. The current valuation is $480,000. Sometimes $450,000. The body corporate fees are $5,000-$8,000 a year and climbing. The rental yield barely covers the interest, let alone the other holding costs.

They can't sell without crystallising a loss. They can't refinance because the property is worth less than the outstanding loan. They're stuck.

This isn't bad luck. It's a structural problem with apartments as an investment class in Australian cities. And the people getting hit hardest are Chinese-Australian investors who were specifically targeted by developers and sales agents marketing off-the-plan product to the Chinese community.

Let me explain why apartments fail as investments, who profits from selling them, and what to buy instead.

## The core problem: land appreciates, buildings depreciate

Australian property investment works on a simple principle that too many apartment buyers have never been told: the land under a property goes up in value over time, and the building sitting on it goes down.

A house on 600 square metres in Cranbourne for $680,000 has roughly $560,000 in land value and $120,000 in building value [1]. Over ten years, the land appreciates at 7-8% per annum while the building depreciates at 2.5% per year. Net result: the total property value climbs strongly because the appreciating component (land) vastly outweighs the depreciating component (building).

An apartment in Box Hill for $650,000 has maybe $80,000-$100,000 in attributable land value (your fractional share of the common lot) and $550,000 in building value. The tiny land component appreciates, but the massive building component depreciates. Net result: the property barely holds its value, and in oversupplied markets, it actively declines.

CoreLogic data over the ten years to 2024 tells the story starkly. Melbourne houses grew 68.2% in value. Melbourne apartments grew just 16.4% [2]. Adjust for inflation and transaction costs, and apartment investors in many suburbs went backwards in real terms.

This isn't a Melbourne-specific issue. The house-versus-unit divergence exists in every Australian capital. It's a function of land scarcity (finite) versus building supply (the government plans to build 300,000+ high-density dwellings in Victoria over the next decade) [3].

Every new apartment tower that goes up near yours dilutes your scarcity value. Every new house that goes up in an established suburb requires demolishing an existing one — net supply stays flat.

## Body corporate: the silent wealth destroyer

The second problem with apartments is the ongoing cost structure that house owners simply don't face.

Body corporate fees for a standard two-bed apartment in Melbourne run $3,000-$6,000 per year. For buildings with lifts, pools, gyms, and concierge services — the exact amenities that developers use to justify premium prices — annual fees can hit $8,000-$12,000.

And then there are special levies. When the building needs a new roof, cladding remediation (a massive issue post-Grenfell), or elevator replacement, every owner gets hit with a one-off bill. I've seen special levies of $15,000-$40,000 per apartment in Docklands and Southbank towers [4]. You have no control over when these arise or how much they cost.

Let me do the maths. A $650K apartment renting at $500/week. Annual rent: $26,000. Body corporate: $6,000. Council rates: $1,800. Water: $700. Insurance: $1,200. Management fees at 5%: $1,300. Land tax: $1,950. Total costs: $12,950. Net rental income: $13,050. Net yield: 2.0%.

The same $650K spent on a house in the southeast returns $550/week ($28,600/year), with total costs of $8,100 (no body corporate). Net income: $20,500. Net yield: 3.15%.

And the house is appreciating at three to four times the rate of the apartment.

## Why Chinese-Australian investors are disproportionately affected

This is the uncomfortable part.

Developers identified the Chinese-Australian community as a target market for off-the-plan apartments starting around 2013-2014. The sales strategy was deliberate and effective: marketing materials in Mandarin, sales events at Chinese restaurants, WeChat groups promising exclusive deals, and — critically — stamp duty savings on new builds that were presented as the primary financial argument.

The pitch went something like this: "Buy this $600K apartment off the plan. You'll save $25,000 in stamp duty because it's a new build. You'll get depreciation benefits of $10,000 a year. And the developer will guarantee 7% rental return for two years."

All three of those statements could be technically true while being financially disastrous.

The stamp duty saving is real but irrelevant if the property doesn't appreciate. You saved $25K in stamp duty on an asset that depreciated by $80K.

The depreciation deductions are real but they create a cost-base reduction that increases your capital gains tax liability when you sell. You're not saving money — you're deferring it.

The rental guarantee means the developer baked two years of artificially inflated rent into the purchase price. When the guarantee expires, the real market rent is 20-30% lower. You overpaid from day one.

"I've lost count of the number of clients who come to us after realising their 'investment property' has been losing money for five years," says Yan Zhu of PremiumRea. "The common thread is always the same — they bought an apartment, usually off the plan, because someone in their community told them it was a good deal. The deal was good for the developer. Not for the buyer."

## What does the data say about where apartments fail worst?

Not all apartments are created equal, so let me be specific.

The worst performers are high-rise towers (10+ storeys) in oversupplied inner-city pockets. Docklands, Southbank, parts of the CBD, and increasingly Box Hill and Burwood have massive pipeline supply that keeps prices flat.

Box Hill is a case study. Over the past decade, house prices in Box Hill rose approximately 45%. Apartment prices rose just 8% [5]. Meanwhile, there are more than 2,000 apartments in the Box Hill development pipeline still to be completed. Every new project puts downward pressure on existing stock.

Glen Waverley tells a similar story. Houses performed well. Apartments barely moved. The rental yield on a Glen Waverley apartment is around 2.5%, with body corporate eating a significant chunk of that.

The exceptions — and they do exist — are boutique low-rise developments (under 20 units) in established suburbs with genuine scarcity. A two-bed apartment in a 12-unit block in Brighton or Middle Park will perform differently from a two-bed in a 400-unit tower in Docklands. But these boutique properties cost as much as a house in the growth corridor, and the house will still outperform on both yield and capital growth.

## What to buy instead

The alternative is straightforward. Buy land.

A detached house on 500+ square metres of land, in a suburb with constrained supply and strong population growth. The southeast corridor — Cranbourne, Hampton Park, Narre Warren, Berwick — offers entry points between $650,000 and $800,000 for houses on 600-square-metre blocks where the land-to-price ratio exceeds 80% [6].

These properties don't have body corporate. The maintenance costs are a fraction of apartment holding costs. The rental yields are 4-5% (compared to 2-2.5% for apartments). And the capital growth tracks the land value, which has compounded at 7-8% annually in these suburbs over the past decade.

If you're sitting on an underperforming apartment and wondering what to do: run the numbers on selling, taking the loss, and redeploying into land. In many cases, the capital growth differential over five to ten years more than recovers the crystallised loss. Holding a depreciating asset because you don't want to realise a loss is the sunk cost fallacy in action — and it gets more expensive every year.

Every property in your portfolio should be working for you. If it's not growing and it's not producing meaningful cash flow, it's dead weight. Cut it loose.

## References

1. [PremiumRea internal transaction data. Average land-to-price ratio for house purchases in Cranbourne and Hampton Park: 82-88%.](#)
2. [CoreLogic, 'Hedonic Home Value Index — Melbourne', December 2024. 10-year house growth 68.2%, unit growth 16.4%.](https://www.corelogic.com.au/news-research/reports/hedonic-home-value-index)
3. [Victorian Government, 'Housing Statement 2023'. Target: 800,000 new homes by 2034, majority high-density.](https://www.vic.gov.au/housing-statement)
4. [The Age, 'Apartment Owners Hit With Massive Special Levies', 2023. Special levies of $15K-$40K reported in Docklands and Southbank buildings.](https://www.theage.com.au/)
5. [Domain, 'Box Hill Suburb Profile — House vs Unit Performance 2014-2024'. Houses +45%, apartments +8%.](https://www.domain.com.au/suburb-profile/box-hill-vic-3128)
6. [PremiumRea portfolio data. Southeast corridor entry prices $650-800K for 600sqm+ blocks, land-to-price >80%.](#)
7. [ATO, 'Rental Properties — Depreciation Deductions and Cost Base Adjustment', 2024.](https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/investments-and-assets/residential-rental-properties)
8. [REIV, 'Melbourne Median Unit Prices by Suburb Q2 2024'. Box Hill unit median $585K, Docklands $510K.](https://reiv.com.au/market-insights)

---

Source: https://premiumrea.com.au/blog/apartments-vs-houses-chinese-investor-trap
Publisher: PremiumRea (Optima Real Estate) — Melbourne buyers agent
